1862. King Luis I. 100 Reis
Genuine vs. Forgeries
Forgery
The first ‘R’ in ‘CORREIO’ has a noticeably longer leg than the corresponding leg of the second ‘R’. The embossed frame around ‘CORREIO’ is thinner than in the genuine, thus the number of background losangles under and over the characters is higher in the forgery. The upper bar of the frame that includes the king’s head is interrupted by the oval of pearls. The “S” in the left ‘100R.s’ script is differently shaped. There are recurring white blotchy areas in the oval (at least one of the following: under the chin; and/or to the right of the lower head and neck; and/or under the neck).
Illustration by Plácido Ramón de Torres: Album ilustrado de sellos de correo, Barcelona 1879. Torres sold illustrations to various dealers/forgers from 1864 onwards, as well as made forgeries himself.
1866-1870. King Luis I. 5 Reis
Genuine vs. Forgeries
Forgery
Embossed. Profile wrong. Neck too thick. The curve of the hair above the forehead less prominent.
1866-1870. King Luis I. 20 Reis
Genuine vs. Forgeries
Oneglia forgery
Three pearls under ‘E’ in ‘REIS’ (total of 57); against only two pearls (total of 60) in the genuine. The Oval frame does not touch the frame.
1866-1870. King Luis I. 25 Reis
Genuine vs. Forgery
Forgery
Embossed. Profile wrong. Neck too thick. The curve of the hair above the forehead less prominent.
1866-1870. King Luis I. 50 Reis
Genuine vs. Forgery
Forgery
Embossed. Profile wrong. Neck too thick. The curve of the hair above the forehead less prominent.
1866-1870. King Luis I. 100 Reis
Genuine vs. Reprint vs. Forgery
Forgery
The ‘2’ of ‘120’ to the right is missing the right side towards ‘0’. Excessive ink on the lower right side of the frame.
1870-1876. King Luis I. 80 Reis
Genuine vs. Forgery