1920. Germania Surcharged ‘DANZIG’
Genuine vs. Forgery
Genuine Michel #40
Forged overprint on genuine stamp
1920. Berlin Reichspostamt Surcharged ‘DANZIG’
Genuine vs. Forgery
Genuine Michel #48
Forged overprint on genuine stamp
1920. German stamps Surcharged ‘DANZIG’
Genuine vs. Forgeries
General characteristics
Genuine
The beginning upstroke of “a” in Danzig is a tangent to the body of “a”.
Forgery
The beginning upstroke of “a” in Danzig is not a tangent to the body of “a”.
Genuine
The line following the upstroke of “i” in Danzig cut into the back of the “z” and touch the uppermost part of “g”.
Forgery
The line following the upstroke of “i” in Danzig does not cut into the back of the “z” or touch the uppermost part of “g”.
1921. Flugpost. 5 Mark
Genuine vs. Forgery
Genuine Michel#70y
Serrate rouletted 13 1/2. Honeycomb wmk.
Soecknick certificate (2012)
Essay with forged perforations
Forged Covers / Cards
Forged Vorläufer cover
Postmark is from 1920. The name “Freie Stadt Danzig” was not used until 1921.
Stamps added to genuine card.
Forged postmark copied from French handbook applied
Stamps added to genuine card.
Forged postmark copied from French handbook applied
Stamps added to genuine card.
Forged postmark copied from French handbook applied
Forged Postmarks
Forged postmark on genuine stamp
Forged postmark on genuine stamp
24-hour postmark (’17-18′). Lacks ‘V’ for Vormittag or ‘N’ for Nachmittag
Signed ‘Jendroszek’ on the back
Forged postmark on genuine stamp
Thanks to perf12 for forgery analysis
Experts
Get certificates from this expert
Discuss
on Facebook
Contact
Stampforgeries.com