Forged Stamps of Przedbórz

1918. City Hall. 10 Halerzy

Fischer #12 / Michel #12

Genuine vs. Forgeries

Words of Wisdom

According to expert Stefan Petriuk: “if you can’t figure out what type of Przedbórz stamp it is, then it’s a forgery.”

1
2
Przedborz_Michel12_Genuine_Type1
1

Left inner frame line descends solidly only to the roof line. Some thin spotty remnants further down.

2

Lower right 10; the base of the “0” is about 1 mm lower than the base of the “1”

Genuine type I

1
2
Przedborz_Michel12_Genuine_Type2
1

Left inner frame line is complete to the bottom.

2

Lower right 10; The base of the “0” is about 2 mm lower than the “1”lower than the base of the “1”

Genuine type II

Przedborz_Michel12_Forgery_Type1

Forgery type I

  • – The rays between Rada and Miejska slope downwards to the right instead of the left.
  • – The printing is usually lighter and coarser than on genuine stamps.
  • – Rada Miejska is in smaller letters than on genuine stamps, and slopes down to the right, so that the left top of the R is much closer to the top frame than is the final A of Miejska.
  • – The top of the R in in Rada slopes down to the right; on genuine stamps it’s fairly horizontal.
  • – The tops of the A’s in Rada are pointed; they have flat tops on other genuine and forged stamps. 
Przedborz_Michel12_Forgery_Type2

Forgery type II

  • – Virtually all the lines are thicker and heavier than those on genuine stamps.  This is especially noticeable on the arc under 1918.
  • – The top of the R in in Rada slopes down to the right; on genuine stamps it’s fairly horizontal.
Przedborz_Michel12_Forgery_Type3

Forgery type III

(also known as Posthumous Issue 7 in Germany and Poland)

– Rada has a thin solid line between the A and D; on other genuine and forged stamps it’s broken.

Thanks to Sam Ginsburg for images and analysis of Przedborz forgeries

Country Index

Przedbórz

Discuss

on Facebook

Discuss

on Google+

Contact

Stampforgeries.com